ColossiansOne

Side by side, from the sources

Varuna vs Ahura Mazda

These two are identified with one another in the record, which is not the same as being the same figure. Both called asura/ahura and both keepers of cosmic order — the clearest Indo-Iranian survival.

Deity · Vedic · c. 1400 BCE

Varuna

also called Baruna

Binder of the oath-breaker with his noose. The earliest hymns call him *asura*, using the word as an honorific, long before it turned demonic.

Alignment
Disputed
Rank
Keeper of Cosmic Order
First attested
Rigveda · c. 1500-1200 BCE
Named there as
Varuna
Texts naming it
3
Powers attributed
4
90attestedVedic & Hindu

Deity · Persian · c. 1000 BCE

Ahura Mazda

also called Ohrmazd, Hormuz, Ahuramazda, Ormuzd, Oromasdes, 𐬀𐬵𐬎𐬭𐬋 𐬨𐬀𐬰𐬛𐬃

The uncreated god of Zoroastrianism, opposed by Angra Mainyu — the pairing that probably gave Judaism and Christianity their two-sided cosmos.

Alignment
Celestial
Rank
The Wise Lord
First attested
The Avesta · c. 1000-400 BCE
Named there as
Ahura Mazda
Texts naming it
3
Powers attributed
3
66attestedZoroastrian

Where do they actually overlap?

Texts naming both

None. The two never appear in the same text in this corpus, which is worth knowing before accepting any confident claim that they are one figure.

Powers credited to both

Common questions

Are Varuna and Ahura Mazda the same figure?

These two are identified with one another in the record, which is not the same as being the same figure. Both called asura/ahura and both keepers of cosmic order — the clearest Indo-Iranian survival. ColossiansOne records the link rather than asserting the identity: where texts disagree about whether two names denote one figure, the disagreement is what gets shown.

Which is older, Varuna or Ahura Mazda?

Varuna is the older name: first attested around c. 1400 BCE, against c. 1000 BCE for Ahura Mazda. Where the two dates are far apart, that gap is the whole reason the pair is worth comparing.

Do any texts name both Varuna and Ahura Mazda?

No text in this corpus names both. That is not proof they were considered the same figure, but it is why the identification has to be traced through the scholarship rather than read off a page.